In many late-life assets, decisions shaped by Cessation of Production are discussed repeatedly but not formally closed.
Life-extension investments are considered but not committed. Operating philosophy evolves incrementally. Integrity scope is revisited. Emissions investments are delayed. Indicative CoP timing shifts without a clearly articulated basis.
The individual choices are familiar. What is less often explicit is how they fit together, what trade-offs they reflect, and under what conditions the position would change.
The consequence is lack of explicit commitment to a coherent direction.
Cessation of Production (CoP) defines the point at which hydrocarbon production ceases permanently. It influences a cluster of interdependent decisions:
The Cessation of Production Readiness Review applies structured Decision Quality principles to the full decision set shaped by CoP timing.
Week 1: Define the decision set, objectives, value metrics and assumptions.
Week 2: Examine alternatives, test trade-offs and assess uncertainty.
Week 3: Assess decision quality and commitment, identify actions required.
A focused conversation to determine whether your CoP-context decisions are clearly framed, internally coherent and ready for commitment — and whether a three-week review would add value.
Schedule via Calendly